The Army’s New Handgun. What Should It Be?

M9-pistoletPublished reports indicate that the Army has  decided to kick the M-9 Beretta service pistol to the curb and not consider the upgraded M-9A3 for its new Modular Handgun System. So what should replace it?

Opinions are like certain parts of the human anatomy. Everybody has one. I spent 20 years in the Army (combat infantry veteran) and 8 of those years I was involved in the Army’s Marksmanship Program, both as a professional shooter and instructor. I was a firing member of the Army Pistol team 8 years at the Nationals and am a holder of the Army’s Gold Distinguished Pistol Shot badge. Now that I have suitably impressed you, what does that have to do with what handgun the Army should replace the M-9 with? Not a lot really other that I have dealt with handguns a lot both in the field and on the range and have drawn some conclusions.

I was on active duty when the Army transitioned from the 1911a1 in .45acp to the Beretta M-9 in 9mm. I never particularly cared for the M-9 for a number of reasons. I have small hands and the grip is a little too large for me, and not much to be done about it. It was an easy swap to put a flat mainspring housing on any .45 I used. I also never really liked the Beretta open top slide system. The Beretta isn’t a bad gun really, and to some degree got a bit of a bad rap for slides cracking. The truth of that was some SEAL teams were using Israeli Uzi submachine rounds in them and this load would damage any normal handgun with repeated use. However the M-9 is not the “wonder winner” it was cracked up to be. In reality, the M-9 is really nothing more than a German WW2 P-38 with a Beretta open top full length slide. Personally, I believe that the P-38 is the better of the two. The desire to standardize on 9mm was a marginally understandable concept, given NATO commitments, but Colt offered to retrofit all 1911’s in stock to 9mm. As in way too many small arms procurement programs, getting the best equipment to the soldier is not necessarily the top priority. Politics, pride, cost and a whole list of other considerations are involved. Don’t get me wrong. I honestly think the Army wants to equip our troops with the best, but they get a lot of outside pressure as to what constitutes the “best”

Sometimes the desire to “keep up with the Jones” comes into play. The Brits recently switched over from the Browning High Power they have been using since WW2 to the Gen 4 Glock 17. The Glock is an outstanding design, but then again so was the Browning. And so was the 1911a1.

The vast majority of military personnel will never be issued, or trained on handguns. And to me, here is the key rub: Except for Spec Ops units who can buy what they want from their own Black budgets, the average G.I. Joe and Jane will not get the necessary training to effectively use whatever handgun the Army selects . And unless the military is willing to commit the necessary time and ammunition to properly train our soldiers, it really doesn’t matter which handgun they select.

I saw it for over 20 years first hand. The .45 was hailed as “inaccurate”. B.S. I trained too many 95 pound soaking wet female soldiers to shoot arms room .45’s effectively. The military will jump through all kinds of hoops to select the current perception of the “best” handgun, and skimp on both training time and ammunition. (except for Spec Ops).

So, what handgun should replace the M-9 as the basis for a Modular Handgun System? There are a lot of acceptable, quality handguns available.  Since I haven’t read the specifications on the bid, I will make some general observations. If they insist on staying with 9mm, either the Glock 17 or 19 would do nicely. If they can be convinced to return to .45acp, that would open a whole world of possibilities!

So what do you think?

If you liked this article and found it useful, please click the “Vote for Me” icon at the top right of the page. Thanks!

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “The Army’s New Handgun. What Should It Be?

  1. The Springfield Armory XD series of pistols would be a great choice , I have owned and fired almost all of these except the 45 cal, If the DOD ever got their head out of the sand they would switch to the XD/M in 40 cal and never look back. I say this after owning about every brand and caliber including dozens of 9mm pistols and feel the 40 S&W to be the answer to equipping the varied shapes and sizes of our troops.. JMHO God bless , Stay safe

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Personally I believe the biggest mistake the army made was going with the 9mm the 45 was proven in combat thru 3 wars and one police action. It comes down to the U.S. kissing Matos backside

    Like

  3. I’m so glad you mentioned the Browning HP, my personal weapon for years. When the UK swapped over to the Glock 17 I was disgusted.
    A plastic gun with a weak ejection record.
    That had to be one of those stupid MOD procurement decisions.
    Rather like the decision to issue the SA80 garden gun.
    A shit unbalanced weenies gun.

    Like

  4. Pingback: The Army’s New Handgun. What Should It Be? | Azweaponcraftprepper

So what do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s